... so my roommate and I decided to try this. The recipe called for the following ingredients (you can google it yourself)
and here we go, just baking... la la la la la... added the sugars (2 CUPS) with melted butter, later the eggs (2 EGGS) , and you know.. throw in some 2 TSP of vanilla extract.. with some 3 c of flour. All right, well we must not have been on our guard because when we finished our cookie batter was very liquidy. BUT we went along with it anyways.. I mean the recipe called for us to "dissolve baking soda in hot water" and we figured it was just a nice trick since we had never really come across that before. Here's what came out!
It's difficult to tell, but the cookies came out LOOKING like big, thick toasty cookies, and when you tapped them, they would crumble and fall because there was absolutely nothing inside. It was very deceiving.
![]() |
| deceiving cookie >_< |
After this (being the engineer that I am..) I compared the ingredients from this recipe with Nestle's.
This made me upset, especially because I love to bake and I "thought" I was a good baker! So, the next day (today) I decided to try a new recipe from a book I own, In the Small Kitchen by Cara Eisenpress and Phoebe Lapine. Its a great book, I love it. Anyways, they have a "classic chocolate chip cookies" recipe (p.180). So, I had to try one more time...
So here are the ingredient differences. Notice that this recipe doesn't require any vanilla extract :) even better.. we had to borrow some from our neighbors yesterday, and since we couldn't 'pay' them back with cookies we didn't have to use more of their vanilla this time. hehe.
So I added the sugars and the butter together....
After mixing it with a beater I added the ONE egg :) ooo yeah, looks good...
Kept mixing... look at how creamy it looks! :) yes, I like this..
And after all of the solid ingredients... just mixed some more... See the chocolates?
Yes, this is the stuff.
So we finally got to enjoy those classic, traditional chocolate chip cookies.
The world was right yet again.
-Allie









No comments:
Post a Comment